Water quality data

What public records show about Abington's water

Sourced from EPA SDWIS, MassDEP monitoring data, and public notices issued by the Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works, the Town of Abington, and the Town of Rockland.

The system

Abington does not operate its own water utility. Water is supplied by the Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works (ARJWW), a single combined public water system — one EPA/MassDEP Public Water System ID, MA4001000 — jointly owned and governed by the towns of Abington and Rockland through a Joint Board of Water Commissioners. This is genuine joint ownership, not a wholesale arrangement where one town simply buys finished water from another: both towns' names are on the utility, both appoint commissioners, and the system's violation history, PFAS levels, and treatment investments are identical for Abington and Rockland residents because it is, functionally, the same water.

The utility traces back to 1885–1886, when construction committees for both towns (chaired by Augustus H. Wright for Abington and Zenas M. Lane for Rockland) took possession of Great Sandy Bottom Pond in neighboring Pembroke and built roughly 33,000 feet of water main to the Abington/Rockland town line, at a cost of about $140,000.

Today the system draws from four gravel-packed wells in the aquifer beneath Abington plus two surface reservoirs — the John F. Hannigan Memorial Reservoir (Rockland) and Great Sandy Bottom Pond (Pembroke) — treated at three plants: the Myers Avenue Water Treatment Plant in Abington, the Hannigan WTP off Hingham Street in Rockland, and the Great Sandy Bottom Pond WTP in Pembroke. Water from all three blends into one shared distribution network. Beyond Abington and Rockland themselves, interconnections extend service (largely as backup or in specific areas) to parts of Hanson, Pembroke, Whitman, and a section of Hingham near the Abington/Rockland line — which is why a 2025 boil-water order affecting the core system also reached households in those towns.

Population served: public trackers disagree on the exact figure, reporting anywhere from about 33,600 to just under 34,000 people system-wide. We report the range rather than picking whichever number sounds more precise. Administratively, each town runs its own billing portal, but production, treatment, and distribution are unified under the single PWS ID above.

Violation history

Because Abington and Rockland share one PWS ID, every violation below applies to both towns identically — there is no separate "Abington" or "Rockland" violation record, just one system's.

PeriodRuleWhat was found
Q1–Q2 2014, Q1–Q2 2015Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts RuleMCL violations for Total Trihalomethanes (TTHM) and Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), tied to a specific low-flow sampling location on Longwater Drive in Rockland, near the Norwell town line
Starting March 2021; recurring Q2–Q3 2024Massachusetts PFAS6 MCL (20 ppt)Quarterly average of 22.88 ppt for combined PFAS6 at the Hannigan plant's source water; a July 2024 combined raw-water sample at Myers Avenue measured PFOS at 18.8 ppt, above the federal 4 ppt individual limit
May 2025Total Coliform Rule (acute, Tier 1)Total coliform in routine samples (May 12) followed by an E. coli-positive repeat sample (May 14); boil-water order issued for Abington, Rockland, Pembroke, Hanson, Whitman, and part of Hingham, lifted within roughly 72 hours once follow-up samples came back clear

Sources: EPA SDWIS/ECHO violation records (aggregated by multiple independent public trackers, which vary slightly on total violation counts); Town of Abington and Rockland-MA.gov public notices; CBS News Boston and WATD 95.9 FM reporting on the May 2025 boil-water order.

PFAS: the town's real distinguishing story

Unlike some neighboring systems where PFAS testing has come back clean, the Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works has had genuine, repeated MassDEP PFAS6 exceedances at its Hannigan plant source since March 2021, and at least one raw-water PFOS reading at Myers Avenue above the federal individual limit. This is the system's most consequential water story of the past several years, and it's still actively being resolved:

Plant / sourceRecent statusApplicable limit
Hannigan WTP (Rockland)22.88 ppt PFAS6 quarterly average, Mar 2021; exceedances recurred Q2–Q3 202420 ppt (MA PFAS6 MCL)
Hannigan WTP (Rockland)Permanent GAC/resin treatment online since March 4, 2026 — reducing PFAS6 to non-detect20 ppt (MA PFAS6 MCL)
Myers Avenue WTP (Abington)Combined raw water: PFOS at 18.8 ppt, July 30, 20244 ppt (federal PFOS individual limit)
Myers Avenue WTP (Abington)Interim pilot GAC system active; finished water currently testing below the 20 ppt PFAS6 limit; permanent treatment construction underway20 ppt (MA PFAS6 MCL)
Great Sandy Bottom Pond WTP (Pembroke)Consistently well below the PFAS6 limit; no treatment required20 ppt (MA PFAS6 MCL)

Abington and Rockland jointly borrowed roughly $26 million ($13 million each) to install granular activated carbon (GAC) and resin filtration, plus related plant upgrades, at the Myers Avenue and Hannigan plants. In the interim, ARJWW has operated a free self-serve water filling station at its main office (366 Centre Avenue, Rockland) for residents, particularly those in sensitive groups. Flag for verification before publishing further updates: sources differ slightly on whether Myers Avenue's permanent system has fully completed as of this writing or remains under construction with only the interim pilot system active — reconfirm current status directly with ARJWW or its public notices before treating this as fully resolved.

Lead service lines

On October 16, 2024, MassDEP approved a statement from the Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works that its system has no lead, "Galvanized Requiring Replacement" (GRR), or unknown-material service lines, based on a system-wide inventory combining field inspection and records review. That statement doesn't independently verify individual lead connectors or gooseneck fittings at each service line, but it's a genuinely clean result on the material category regulators care about most — and it isn't a data point we'd expect to see on a system that wasn't actively working through its Lead and Copper Rule Revisions obligations.

Regulatory Timeline

How the rules around PFAS in drinking water have actually changed over the past several years — and where they stand right now.

October 2020

Massachusetts sets a first-in-the-nation PFAS standard

MassDEP finalized an enforceable Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 20 parts per trillion (ppt) for the sum of six PFAS compounds ("PFAS6") — PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS, PFNA, PFHpA, and PFDA. This is the standard the Abington-Rockland Joint Water Works has been working to meet at its Hannigan and Myers Avenue plants ever since exceedances first appeared in March 2021.

April 2024

EPA finalizes the first federal PFAS drinking water rule

The EPA's National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR) set the first-ever enforceable federal limits for PFAS: 4 ppt each for PFOA and PFOS individually, 10 ppt each for PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA (GenX), plus a combined Hazard Index limit for mixtures of those and PFBS. Water systems were given until 2027 to complete initial monitoring and until 2029 to come into full compliance. This rule matters directly for Abington-Rockland: a July 2024 raw-water sample at Myers Avenue measured PFOS at 18.8 ppt, well above the new 4 ppt individual limit, underscoring why the treatment project underway at both plants isn't optional.

May 2026

EPA proposes extending the deadline and rescinding part of the rule

On May 18, 2026, EPA proposed two changes. The first (Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2025-1742) would keep the PFOA/PFOS limits at 4 ppt each but let water systems request a two-year compliance extension — to 2031 instead of 2029 — while requiring systems measuring 12 ppt or higher to take short-term mitigation action in the meantime. The second (Docket EPA-HQ-OW-2025-0654) would rescind the individual limits for PFHxS, PFNA, and HFPO-DA and the Hazard Index for PFAS mixtures, leaving the PFOA/PFOS limits untouched. EPA held a virtual public hearing on July 7, 2026, and the combined comment dockets remained open through July 20, 2026, with more than 15,000 comments submitted as of mid-July. EPA has said it intends to take final action on the rescission sometime in 2026 — check EPA's site directly for the current status before assuming either proposal is final. For a system like Abington-Rockland that has actually recorded PFOS readings above the 4 ppt limit, the extension proposal is not a hypothetical — it's directly relevant to how quickly the Myers Avenue treatment project needs to finish.

Sources: Mass.gov — Massachusetts PFAS Drinking Water Standard (MCL); Federal Register — PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (April 2024); EPA — Proposed PFOA and PFOS Compliance Extension Rule; EPA — Proposed PFAS Rescission Rule.

Where to read the primary sources

We don't ask you to take our word for any of this. The underlying reports are public:

Want your own household tested?

System-wide data only tells part of the story — your home's plumbing, fixtures, and how long water sits in your pipes can all change what actually comes out of your tap.

Request a free water test